If you’re responsible for AML in a regulated UK business, EFTs are one of the main highways you need to watch. These transactions tell stories – about the customer, the counterparties, the timing, the amounts, and the patterns. But EFTs move fast, which means your controls need to work just as quickly.
First, EFTs increase your exposure to transaction-based risk. That means you’ll need to build controls that can make sense of thousands – sometimes millions – of payments a day and flag what matters. You can’t afford to rely on simple threshold rules. It’s about context. A £9,000 transfer might mean nothing for one customer and everything for another. Your systems need to know the difference.
Second, EFTs make it easier for illicit funds to be layered and passed between accounts to obscure their origin. That puts more pressure on your monitoring framework. You’ll need tools that can catch structuring, rapid movement of funds, and links between seemingly unrelated accounts. These aren’t just nice-to-haves – they’re standard expectations from the FCA and the PRA during supervisory reviews.
Speed is another challenge. EFTs, especially via Faster Payments, settle almost instantly. That compresses your response window. If something slips through fraud or sanctions screening at the onboarding stage, you’ve got a limited time to stop or recall the funds. So the effectiveness of your front-line detection tools – including sanctions screening, fraud indicators, and data analytics – becomes mission-critical.
So what does this mean for your AML strategy? It’s time to move from static policies to dynamic controls. Revisit how your systems treat different types of EFTs, how your alerts prioritise risk, and how your teams respond in real-time. The regulators are looking not just for compliance, but for insight: can you spot the unusual when it hides in the normal? Can you act before a payment lands where it shouldn’t?
With the right approach, EFTs can become your most reliable source of AML intelligence.