6 AML metrics every CFO should be tracking

aml metrics

The importance of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance cannot be overstated. For regulated companies, adhering to AML regulations is not only a legal obligation, but also a critical part of safeguarding the financial stability and reputation of businesses. 

In an ever-evolving regulatory environment, CFOs play a pivotal role in ensuring that their firms remain on the right side of the law, avoid crippling fines, and safeguard operational success today and in the future. 

In this article, we take a look at some of the KPIs and vital metrics that CFOs should be tracking. By doing so, CFOs can navigate the intricate regulatory landscape, protect their companies from any potential legal ramifications, and enhance their overall financial stability. 

These metrics can help firms to assess, manage, and improve AML compliance, empowering CFOs to make informed decisions that safeguard their company’s financial future. Bear in mind that different metrics may play more of an important role in your business depending on the industry you operate in and customers you serve. 

Customer satisfaction

In its wider sense, customer satisfaction is a critical measure for recurring revenue, loyalty, and referrals. But in terms of AML, customer satisfaction scores can form a solid foundation for measuring the user-friendliness of your onboarding process. There is a fine balance between the need for in-depth onboarding processes to ensure AML compliance and the delivery of an exceptional customer experience.

AML and customer onboarding processes have to be comprehensive to mitigate risk. But, if your processes are too quick, it might mean potential issues are being missed. Conversely, if they’re too long or overly complex, it might lead to a dip in satisfaction and customers jumping ship for your competition. 

Abandonment rates

In a similar vein, abandonment rates are a key indicator of an overly complex or burdensome onboarding process. If your customers are dropping out of their onboarding journey before the point of completion, you’re losing potential revenue. A high abandonment rate can be a sign that an onboarding or verification process is too lengthy or complex. 

Today’s customers prioritise firms that can deliver ease and speed when signing up for new financial products, purchasing items, or accessing services

Take a look at your current onboarding processes through the eyes of your potential customer (even test it out as if you were a prospect!), are there any areas which could be streamlined, automated, or removed entirely while still maintaining compliance with AML requirements? Are you asking your customer to physically present their ID and proof of address in-person? Automate tasks where you can and strip it back to what is absolutely necessary in order for you to onboard customers swiftly and compliantly. 

Average time-to-revenue

A critical measure for CFOs and the wider C-suite is the time it takes for a prospective client to become a paying customer. If customers are being held up during the onboarding process, this delays revenue from coming into your business.  When onboarding processes are sluggish, it can take longer to approve new customers or clients. This delay can be a significant roadblock for businesses, especially for those in industries with high customer turnover or during periods of rapid growth. 

What’s more, slow onboarding can put a business at a significant disadvantage compared to competitors who can onboard customers more swiftly and efficiently.

Use of revenue-generating time 

In businesses without a dedicated compliance function, sales team members, fee earners, and other valuable resources can often be using their time to carry out AML-related tasks. These staff members are valuable resources within your organisation and diverting their time away from revenue-generating activities can result in a loss of billable hours.

How much of your fee earners’ time is being spent on AML compliance processes that could be better spent elsewhere? Are bottlenecks during onboarding impacting customer revenue? 

Fee earners are typically specialised in their respective fields, such as law, finance, or sales, and their time is best spent on tasks directly related to their expertise. What’s more, conducting AML checks for customer onboarding is a critical, compliance-focused task. Without expert input and oversight, any errors could be costly with financial penalties and your firm’s reputation at stake. 

Adherence to regulations

An important measure for every business is their ability to adhere to regulatory requirements and avoid financial penalties, sanctions and reputational damage. For CFOs, avoiding sanctions and penalties from AML non-compliance is critical. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in significant legal and regulatory penalties, including fines, imprisonment, and even the loss of operating licences. CFOs play a key role in ensuring that the company complies with these regulations, and measuring adherence is critical to avoid legal repercussions.

What’s more, investors and shareholders are increasingly concerned about AML compliance, as it can impact the value and sustainability of their investments. CFOs need to demonstrate their commitment to AML compliance to address these concerns and attract and retain investors.

Money laundering and terrorist financing activities can introduce financial risks to a company, such as fraud, loss of assets, and potential legal liabilities. By tracking adherence to AML regulations, CFOs can help mitigate these financial risks and safeguard the company’s financial health.

Cost of non-compliance

Measuring the cost of non-compliance with AML regulations, including fines and penalties, is an important metric for CFOs of regulated companies. Fines and penalties resulting from AML non-compliance can be substantial and have a direct impact on a company’s financial performance. CFOs are responsible for managing the company’s financial health, and understanding the cost of non-compliance allows them to assess the financial implications and allocate resources accordingly. 

Understanding the cost of non-compliance serves as a strong incentive for CFOs to ensure that the company complies with AML regulations. Avoiding fines and penalties is not only about minimising costs but also about complying with the law and regulatory requirements

In tracking the costs associated with AML fines and penalties, CFOs can include these expenses in their budgeting and financial planning. The financial impact of non-compliance can influence strategic decision-making, such as expansion plans, investment decisions, and mergers and acquisitions. CFOs need to be aware of the potential costs associated with non-compliance to make informed strategic choices.

By monitoring AML metrics, CFOs can budget for potential AML-related expenses, address shareholder and investor concerns, make informed strategic decisions, optimise operational efficiency, foster a compliance culture, and drive ongoing improvements in AML compliance practices. In summary, tracking AML metrics is crucial for maintaining the company’s financial health, legal compliance, and reputation, while informing strategic and operational decision-making.

Blog call to action - demo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>